Rendered at 02:32:06 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
ACCount39 3 hours ago [-]
It's impressive that something this simple can do this much. But those funky types of actuators all live and die by transfer learning now.
If a robot AI can figure out how to operate them with very little sim and teleop data, and learn to take advantage of their strengths while maintaining good performance on tasks learned from UMI datasets, teleop data or human headcam videos? Allowing the same "robot mind" to work with different actuators?
Then I would expect those to have a decent niche - sitting between the classic two finger UMI gripper and a humanoid hand. Not a drop-in replacement for a human hand, but still more dexterity per hand without sacrificing all of the ruggedness and mechanical simplicity.
If transfer learning for different actuator types doesn't work so well? I expect the field to collapse to a binary of "UMI gripper or humanoid hand", with nearly no in-between.
In general, I'm carefully optimistic? But we are yet to demonstrate with confidence that this kind of transfer for actuators with radically different kinematics would work.
measurablefunc 2 hours ago [-]
Should be doable w/ existing AIs to generate a staged sequence of operations by taking a demonstration & deriving another sequence of operations for achieving the same outcome w/ another set of actuators. I'm not a roboticist but robotic arms have specifications & those specifications are basically generalized algebraic datatypes so Astra or even Grok should be able to generate programs for manipulating most objects.
Animats 9 hours ago [-]
It works best on problems which are strongly Cartesian. The chopsticks demo shows the limitations of this. The gripper can pick up two chopsticks, but it can't do much with them, because it can't rotate them to bring them together at the points.
But it seems to be good for lab equipment with simple geometry.
Also, where are the motors? Inside the gripper, or at the other end of cables?
octoberfranklin 8 hours ago [-]
Rotational screw-on caps are not Cartesian, and this excels at dealing with them.
I'm very impressed with this.
Re: chopsticks, oh but it can! It can roll one chopstick between one pair of grippers. Do that while holding the tip against a fixed object and you'll tilt the chopstick. Once you get the tips touching, it can use them.
The motors are inside those chonky things just outside the fingertips. I'm guessing hobby servos, which are tiny cheap and strong.
varjag 6 hours ago [-]
Still there are fundamental limitations. Holding a bowl full of liquid, a heavy jug with a rounded handle etc.
octoberfranklin 5 hours ago [-]
What would be the problem with a bowl of liquid?
The balancing there comes from the wrist joint, not the fingers. Obviously this device is supposed to be mounted on a wrist joint that can rotate (pitch+yaw). Wrist joints are pretty well-understood these days.
Rounded handle I don't see the problem unless the hole is too small for one of the fingers.
varjag 5 hours ago [-]
Holding a rounded handle with a rectangular profile slider is inherently unstable as it's extremely sensitive to the pinch point.
And the bowl has a radius that make orthogonal grip impractical.
One of the challenging parts of imitating human hands is that our hands sense through the same surface which deforms as we bend our fingers. We don't have good robotic devices that can do that.
This sidesteps the problem: the surface that contacts the object is flat and never bends, so you can apply a huge variety of very detailed grid sensors to it.
The "rolling between the fingers" trick is ultimately what eliminates the need for deformation.
If a robot AI can figure out how to operate them with very little sim and teleop data, and learn to take advantage of their strengths while maintaining good performance on tasks learned from UMI datasets, teleop data or human headcam videos? Allowing the same "robot mind" to work with different actuators?
Then I would expect those to have a decent niche - sitting between the classic two finger UMI gripper and a humanoid hand. Not a drop-in replacement for a human hand, but still more dexterity per hand without sacrificing all of the ruggedness and mechanical simplicity.
If transfer learning for different actuator types doesn't work so well? I expect the field to collapse to a binary of "UMI gripper or humanoid hand", with nearly no in-between.
In general, I'm carefully optimistic? But we are yet to demonstrate with confidence that this kind of transfer for actuators with radically different kinematics would work.
Also, where are the motors? Inside the gripper, or at the other end of cables?
I'm very impressed with this.
Re: chopsticks, oh but it can! It can roll one chopstick between one pair of grippers. Do that while holding the tip against a fixed object and you'll tilt the chopstick. Once you get the tips touching, it can use them.
The motors are inside those chonky things just outside the fingertips. I'm guessing hobby servos, which are tiny cheap and strong.
The balancing there comes from the wrist joint, not the fingers. Obviously this device is supposed to be mounted on a wrist joint that can rotate (pitch+yaw). Wrist joints are pretty well-understood these days.
Rounded handle I don't see the problem unless the hole is too small for one of the fingers.
And the bowl has a radius that make orthogonal grip impractical.
This sidesteps the problem: the surface that contacts the object is flat and never bends, so you can apply a huge variety of very detailed grid sensors to it.
The "rolling between the fingers" trick is ultimately what eliminates the need for deformation.